By Richard Jones
Development organizations are sometimes criticized for talking about carrying out an education project here, or a sanitation project there, without taking the long-term view on what will happen to their target communities once the project runs its course, the funds dry up and the aid workers leave.
Development organizations are sometimes criticized for talking about carrying out an education project here, or a sanitation project there, without taking the long-term view on what will happen to their target communities once the project runs its course, the funds dry up and the aid workers leave.
That’s why Plan International CEO Nigel Chapman claims he
is often much more excited about what his organization is
doing to help nurture the future leaders of tomorrow.
“I’ve seen far more impact in taking young women and girls
and getting them to present the case for education, than I
could ever do with the current leaders in their own societies.
It’s hard to resist that,” he told Devex in an exclusive
interview in Brussels earlier this month.
Read on for more insights
from Chapman about how
Plan views youth civic
engagement, is doing its part
to help empower young
leaders, and is committed to
encouraging youth to learn
how to solve not only their
own problems, but future
challenges for their
communities.
From Plan’s perspective,
what’s the most important
thing that you would
encourage youth to do to
empower them to be more
influential in setting the
global development
agenda?
It’s obviously very important
for the youth to go to school,
and to end up with as good a
quality education as they can.
We’ve always argued that
girls, in particular, need nine
years of continuous
education. But the bigger
thing for me are the side
effects of investment and
development. Some see
development as “it’s a water
project, or a health project, or
an education project,” but
what I get most excited about
is the leaders of tomorrow.
Who in the end is going to
hold governments to account
for their actions? That's what
makes things change, in the
end.
To stand as candidates in
elections, you need young
people coming through who
are articulate, well-informed,
who can organize themselves,
who can engage in the
political process at a
community level, maybe on a
more formal level. It’s crucial
that they are part of that, and that they do not feel
ostracized, left out and on the margins.
I sometimes think some of the best work we do is helping to
create those leaders of the future, who will be more
accountable to the people. We talk about intervention and
aid, but in the end people have to hold leaders to account
for things. If they don't have the wherewithal, if they don't
have the experience, they can't articulate that and then
the leaders get away with it.
Is the role of international nongovernmental
organizations then to lead a push toward stronger
engagement and leadership for youth?
It’s about engaging with them in your work so they become
advocates for causes, themes or areas that an international
NGO wants to work with them on. Mobilizing their voices is
sometimes far more powerful than development projects.
I've seen far more impact in
taking young women and girls
and getting them to present
the case for education than I
could ever do with the current
leaders in their own societies.
It’s hard to resist that. Maybe
if you're a political leader
running for an election you've
got to think about your
political base. You can be
cavalier in the beginning, but you can't be by the end I
think that's really how change happens.
We're very much a facilitator of amplifying that community
voice or making that community voice happen in the first
place. ... Young people aged 12 to 20 in particular have got
the energy and the time to mobilize and have a profound
impact on the priorities of leaders both at the local and the
national levels. We must enable them to have the weapons
and the confidence to do just that.
What are the obstacles in the current way of “doing
development” in order to empower youth as a
crosscutting theme?
It takes time and engagement and has the risk that if you
have a very time-limited grant let’s say two or three years that may not be enough time to build the capacity inside
a community so that it can articulate its wishes and its
demands, and hold leaders accountable for their actions.
One of the highlights of Plan's funding model a mix of
institutional funds, corporate funds and high levels of public
support is you get the funding in order to do that. You can
stay the course and deliver that cadre of leaders for the
future and I think that's fantastic.
------
About the author
In his role as Devex associate editor, Richard Jones covers the full spectrum of development aid in Europe, Africa and the Middle East by conducting high-level
interviews, providing analysis and supervising correspondents. Richard, who's currently based in Barcelona, brings to bear 10 years of experience as an
editor in institutional communications, public affairs and international development. His development experience
includes stints in the Dominican Republic, Argentina and Ecuador.
No comments:
Post a Comment